William Burke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PASFAA Policy Positions #17267
    William Burke
    Spectator

    I agree with the general recommendations, although they do lack specificity, which I think is intentional and not an oversight. I’m unsure of our position on FAFSA data methodology, as it was listed as a topic requiring follow-up. Perhaps more details should be provided to membership. Also, I am unsure why no recommendations are being provided on Campus Based Programs, particularly FWS. Perhaps, because many PA schools enjoy the benefits of the base guarantees due to earlier participation in the programs, PASFAA did not want to address equity funding across the board. However, I think we should be concerned about attempts to reduce funding for FSEOG and FWS. FWS really is the only federal aid program where students have real time shin in the game. Just think of how many of our members participated in the program as students.

    in reply to: Private Sector Forum #16590
    William Burke
    Spectator

    Mark, while retired, I am not yet dead, so I have been trying to keep track of HEERF funding. When I was director at Scranton, we used HEERF I funding trying to adhere to the spirit of the law and altering guidance provided by ED. We used an online application asking all eligible students, both UG and on campus Grad students, to identify additional expenses caused by the disruption of on campus learning. We honored all requests, with limitations set for each category of expenses: transportation, technology, books and supplies, etc…. without regard to demonstrated financial need. HEERF II and I suppose III appear to allow much more flexibility. Prior to my retirement, I did provide the administration some suggestions on how to award the II funds that had been legislated using a tiered need approach like what you are considering and reserving a smaller pool to address any specific needs that may be identified through an application— technology needs, additional costs that may occur due to COVID 19 restrictions, etc… I’m unsure when III funds need to be spent and share Greg’s concern on how much layering of funds to the same populations should be done.

    in reply to: PJs during COVID-19 #15532
    William Burke
    Spectator

    The University of Scranton is also seriously considering how best to handle PJ cases resulting from reduced income due to COVID-19. Like PHEAA and many schools, we normally require a waiting period (two months for us) before considering estimates of calendar year income (2020 expected to replace 2018 FAFSA income). We also normally require verification of FAFSA base year income. Like many, we expect many more requests for 2020-21. We are trying to determine all of the provisions of ED guidance and CARES Act. I know some colleagues are considering following PHEAA’s reduced income procedures, which is to make an initial determination and follow up late fall to obtain a more precise estimate. We are continuing our discussion and would appreciate seeing other’s comments on Forum.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)